arrow_back Back Filing freshness 20-F FY 2020 SEC EDGAR

download Export Data

TOYOTA MOTOR CORP/

$187.63 ▲ +1.84 (+0.99%) at close

11 Visible periods

29 Metrics

Absolute Benchmarks

Price Chart

insights

Verdict pending

Sync financial data to generate a health grade for this company.

auto_awesome

Analytical Summary

On an absolute basis, TOYOTA MOTOR CORP/ shows solid but mixed fundamentals. These readings use fixed quality thresholds rather than peer benchmarks, because too few comparable companies are available to rank against.

Market Cap $525.2B

Dividend Yield —

Revenue Growth None

Op. Margin None

ROIC None

FCF / Share None

Trailing P/E —

Price / Book —

FCF Yield —

Debt / Equity —

info Valuation on last close. End-of-day price, Aug 6, 2026.

11-Year Financial Trajectory

Annual

Metric Value Trend Year over Year Percentile

Revenue Total top-line sales

$234.60B

↑ +3.8% —

Net Income Profit after all expenses

$10.23B

↑ +196.5% —

Operating Margin Operating profit as % of sales

6.0%

↑ +212.8% —

FCF / Share Free cash flow per share

$5.36

↑ +90.0% —

info Signals below are graded against fixed quality thresholds, not peers — peer ranking needs more comparable companies.

Dividend History

Dividend / share · sourced from SEC filings

$0.96 Latest / share

+57.4% YoY

+57.4% 2-yr CAGR

FY 2010

FY 2011

$0.61

FY 2012

$0.96

FY 2013

FY 2014

FY 2015

FY 2016

FY 2017

FY 2018

FY 2019

FY 2020

Financial view

Statement lens

Choose the reporting cadence, isolate a period range, or search directly for a metric.

Cadence

Annual Quarterly

Range

→

📈 Is growth accelerating? 4 metrics

Metric	FY 2020 Mar 31, 2020 20-F ↗	FY 2019 Mar 31, 2019 20-F ↗	FY 2018 Mar 31, 2018 20-F ↗	FY 2017 Mar 31, 2017 20-F ↗	FY 2016 Mar 31, 2016 20-F ↗	FY 2015 Mar 31, 2015 20-F ↗	FY 2014 Mar 31, 2014 20-F ↗	FY 2013 Mar 31, 2013 20-F ↗	FY 2012 Mar 31, 2012 20-F ↗	FY 2011 Mar 31, 2011 20-F ↗	FY 2010 Mar 31, 2010 20-F ↗
Revenue Growth YoY (%)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	3.8% Caution Caution Year-over-year change in total revenue Optimal: > 10% vs Sector: Below avg (-46%)	—	—	—
EPS Growth YoY (%)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	193.6% Excellent Excellent Year-over-year change in earnings per share Optimal: > 10%	—	—	—
Net Income Growth YoY (%)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	196.5% Excellent Excellent Year-over-year change in net income	—	—	—
FCF Growth YoY (%)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	90.0% Excellent Excellent Year-over-year change in free cash flow	—	—	—

💰 Are margins durable? 4 metrics

Metric	FY 2020 Mar 31, 2020 20-F ↗	FY 2019 Mar 31, 2019 20-F ↗	FY 2018 Mar 31, 2018 20-F ↗	FY 2017 Mar 31, 2017 20-F ↗	FY 2016 Mar 31, 2016 20-F ↗	FY 2015 Mar 31, 2015 20-F ↗	FY 2014 Mar 31, 2014 20-F ↗	FY 2013 Mar 31, 2013 20-F ↗	FY 2012 Mar 31, 2012 20-F ↗	FY 2011 Mar 31, 2011 20-F ↗	FY 2010 Mar 31, 2010 20-F ↗
Operating Margin (%) (%)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	6.0% Weak Weak Operating income as a percentage of revenue Optimal: > 15% vs Sector: Below avg (-50%)	1.9% Weak Weak Operating income as a percentage of revenue Optimal: > 15% vs Sector: Below avg (-84%)	—	—
Profit Margin (%) (%)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	4.4% Weak Weak Net income as a percentage of revenue Optimal: > 15% vs Sector: Below avg (-45%)	1.5% Weak Weak Net income as a percentage of revenue Optimal: > 15% vs Sector: Below avg (-81%)	—	—
FCF Margin (%) (%)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	7.2% Caution Caution Free cash flow as a percentage of revenue Optimal: > 10%	3.9% Weak Weak Free cash flow as a percentage of revenue Optimal: > 10%	—	—
FCF / Net Income (x)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1.66x Excellent Excellent Free cash flow relative to reported net income Optimal: > 1x	2.57x Excellent Excellent Free cash flow relative to reported net income Optimal: > 1x	—	—

🎯 Is capital allocation efficient? 3 metrics

Metric	FY 2020 Mar 31, 2020 20-F ↗	FY 2019 Mar 31, 2019 20-F ↗	FY 2018 Mar 31, 2018 20-F ↗	FY 2017 Mar 31, 2017 20-F ↗	FY 2016 Mar 31, 2016 20-F ↗	FY 2015 Mar 31, 2015 20-F ↗	FY 2014 Mar 31, 2014 20-F ↗	FY 2013 Mar 31, 2013 20-F ↗	FY 2012 Mar 31, 2012 20-F ↗	FY 2011 Mar 31, 2011 20-F ↗	FY 2010 Mar 31, 2010 20-F ↗
Return on Invested Capital (%)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	8.6% Fair Fair Return earned on debt + equity capital invested Optimal: > 10%	2.7% Weak Weak Return earned on debt + equity capital invested Optimal: > 10%	—	—
Return on Capital (%) (%)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	3.7% Weak Weak Operating profit relative to total assets Optimal: > 10%	1.2% Weak Weak Operating profit relative to total assets Optimal: > 10%	—	—
Return on Common Equity (%) (%)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	7.9% Caution Caution Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity Optimal: > 15% vs Sector: Below avg (-60%)	2.7% Weak Weak Profit generated per dollar of shareholder equity Optimal: > 15% vs Sector: Below avg (-87%)	—	—

⚖️ Is the balance sheet risky? 4 metrics

Metric	FY 2020 Mar 31, 2020 20-F ↗	FY 2019 Mar 31, 2019 20-F ↗	FY 2018 Mar 31, 2018 20-F ↗	FY 2017 Mar 31, 2017 20-F ↗	FY 2016 Mar 31, 2016 20-F ↗	FY 2015 Mar 31, 2015 20-F ↗	FY 2014 Mar 31, 2014 20-F ↗	FY 2013 Mar 31, 2013 20-F ↗	FY 2012 Mar 31, 2012 20-F ↗	FY 2011 Mar 31, 2011 20-F ↗	FY 2010 Mar 31, 2010 20-F ↗
Debt to Equity (x)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.34x Good Good Total debt relative to shareholder equity Optimal: < 0.6x vs Sector: Below avg (-58%)	0.33x Good Good Total debt relative to shareholder equity Optimal: < 0.6x vs Sector: Below avg (-59%)	—	—
Interest Coverage (x)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	57.56x Excellent Excellent Operating income divided by interest expense Optimal: > 5x	15.51x Excellent Excellent Operating income divided by interest expense Optimal: > 5x	—	—
Net Debt (USD)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	$25.21B	$21.55B	$-25.32B	—
Debt / EBITDA (x)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1.69x Good Good Debt relative to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation Optimal: < 2x	2.42x Fair Fair Debt relative to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation Optimal: < 2x	—	—

📊 What does each share earn? 8 metrics

Metric	FY 2020 Mar 31, 2020 20-F ↗	FY 2019 Mar 31, 2019 20-F ↗	FY 2018 Mar 31, 2018 20-F ↗	FY 2017 Mar 31, 2017 20-F ↗	FY 2016 Mar 31, 2016 20-F ↗	FY 2015 Mar 31, 2015 20-F ↗	FY 2014 Mar 31, 2014 20-F ↗	FY 2013 Mar 31, 2013 20-F ↗	FY 2012 Mar 31, 2012 20-F ↗	FY 2011 Mar 31, 2011 20-F ↗	FY 2010 Mar 31, 2010 20-F ↗
Revenue per Share (USD)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	$74.08	$71.93	—	—
Basic EPS, GAAP (USD)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	$3.23	$1.10	—	—
Free Cash Flow per Share (USD)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	$5.36	$2.82	—	—
Dividend per Share (USD)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	$0.96	$0.61	—	—
Book Value per Share (USD)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	$40.78	$40.53	—	—
Tangible Book Value per Share (USD)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	$40.78	$40.53	—	—
Basic Weighted Avg Shares (shares)	2.80B	2.87B	2.95B	3.01B	3.11B	3.16B	3.17B	3.17B	3.14B	3.14B	3.14B
Dividend Payout Ratio (%)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	29.7% Excellent Excellent Dividends paid as a percentage of earnings Optimal: 30-60%	55.5% Fair Fair Dividends paid as a percentage of earnings Optimal: 30-60%	—	—

🏦 How resilient is the balance sheet? 2 metrics

Metric	FY 2020 Mar 31, 2020 20-F ↗	FY 2019 Mar 31, 2019 20-F ↗	FY 2018 Mar 31, 2018 20-F ↗	FY 2017 Mar 31, 2017 20-F ↗	FY 2016 Mar 31, 2016 20-F ↗	FY 2015 Mar 31, 2015 20-F ↗	FY 2014 Mar 31, 2014 20-F ↗	FY 2013 Mar 31, 2013 20-F ↗	FY 2012 Mar 31, 2012 20-F ↗	FY 2011 Mar 31, 2011 20-F ↗	FY 2010 Mar 31, 2010 20-F ↗
Working Capital (USD)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	$9.28B	$6.57B	—	—
Total Equity (USD)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	$129.17B	$128.36B	—	—

📋 What is driving earnings? 4 metrics

Metric	FY 2020 Mar 31, 2020 20-F ↗	FY 2019 Mar 31, 2019 20-F ↗	FY 2018 Mar 31, 2018 20-F ↗	FY 2017 Mar 31, 2017 20-F ↗	FY 2016 Mar 31, 2016 20-F ↗	FY 2015 Mar 31, 2015 20-F ↗	FY 2014 Mar 31, 2014 20-F ↗	FY 2013 Mar 31, 2013 20-F ↗	FY 2012 Mar 31, 2012 20-F ↗	FY 2011 Mar 31, 2011 20-F ↗	FY 2010 Mar 31, 2010 20-F ↗
Sales/Revenue/Turnover (USD)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	$234.60B	$226.11B	—	—
Depreciation Expense (USD)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	$11.75B	$12.99B	—	—
Net Income, GAAP (USD)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	$10.23B	$3.45B	—	—
Operating Cash Flow (USD)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	$26.06B	$17.67B	—	—

⌨️ Keyboard Shortcuts

/ Search

Esc Clear

A Annual

Q Quarterly

1-7 Jump to category

R Reset

bar_chart Data from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings

Synced 1 week ago 11 years · 10 quarters

TOYOTA MOTOR CORP/

Analytical Summary

11-Year Financial Trajectory

Dividend History

Statement lens

Benchmark Lens

Benchmarks unavailable

Compare TM with peers